HD TV, Whats the best? Plasma, LCD? I want the best value for my money....? - whats the best bank for lcd
I really want an HDTV, but I want the best picture of my money. What is the best brand, type, etc., without the bank. I do not know much about the game, Plasma, LCD, note, etc. What should I do?
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Whats The Best Bank For Lcd HD TV, Whats The Best? Plasma, LCD? I Want The Best Value For My Money....?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"With an LCD, you get no burn-in like plasma.
"Perhaps, but you see falling output pixels.
"And with the LCD screen is brighter and clearer!
The picture becomes clearer in the plasma. What better because it has a backlight that is always at full power. Most people see their production of high brightness, anyway. If you're TV is a theater "reference" picture mode Cinema "or" This mode is closer to the original intent of the Creator on the ad.
"Most LCD TVs are lighter and consume less energy."
LCDs are lighter, because they are smaller. Nevertheless, some companies try to create a small plasmacompete w / the cost of the LCD display. Soon you will see a 32 "plasma.
"For fast action movies ..."
Because reaction times faster than LCDs.
"... In the darker colors."
-Due to the ability of contrast. In addition, depending on how they are made, the better the colors of light.
"Burn in the paintings of photographs."
-Do not hold the same image on a position on the screen more than 15% of the week to see and should have no problems.
"40" plasma and UP. "
"Actually, now 37" at up to 103 ".
"LCD: For the best picture quality, they last much longer than plAsthma.
"It takes longer, in what area? The native 1080p plasma lamp will last on average more than 11 years when they left on 24 / 7 And the average household size of the TV on 7 hours per day - almost 40 years lamp life. not sure if you are permanently in a different way?
"There is no image burn ins.
"As I said, but no loss of output pixels, which is more common and can so embarrassing.
"Range of LCD-1" and UP. "
"The average is 7" to 32 "but has a Sharp 108" and another company (I know) no longer has a 110 ".
"Moreover ........ plasmas are less energy efficient. Rather consume in order toPower and 25-30% more than the same size LCD. "
"Also a common mistake. In fact, LCD screens are less energy efficient. Like I said, the LCD backlight that - even if the picture is in complete darkness - not yet completed. In a plasma, if not a black screen, the light passes through the pixels, which is completely closed, will be transferred. Therefore, it remains only the power significantly. energy consumption based on the size and type of representation is essentially the same.
"Although the problem of selling large plasma" blackest black ", ie the difference ...... I noticed a 46" plasma and LCD side by side, and frankly, do not see the difference. "
"It depends on the combination of what he saw and the model. SomE of less expensive, they have the highest contrast ratio specifications.
"I had to dig deep, but I bought a 46" Sony Bravia (LCD.) to, in my humble opinion, can grow TVs-but-not do better than that. Viewing a DVD to the Blu-ray 1080p is right in front of the "impressive". "
Sign in AW / plasma contrast ratio of 20,000:1 and a native resolution of 1080p (now 1440). So, wait until you get a TV with the new HDMI specification, deep color (10, 12 and 16 bit). If you think it's great now - that the progress now with HDMI 1.3 specification is now available bandwidth doubles in the cable.
"Good luck to you, no matter what technology or brandShopping Cart - attracts attention ultimtley its budget and must make the decision. "
Declaration of the truest of all.
Neither is better for everyone. Plasmas are better for the people who Flaste big screen. 42in is not regarded as important. Plasmas better color so far. They have a reflective screen, which is not a good choice in a room can be very bright window. They are also subject to burn if you have a picture on the TV for a long time.
best plasmas, in my opinion, those of Pioneer.
LCDs are probably the best option for the smallest TV in the mark of 42 inches or smaller. They lack the image quality of plasma. However, they do not have a reflective screen so that you do not do to ensure glare. Screen burn in is almost impossible.
Best Sony Bravia LCD
Let me just for you ...
Plasma: For fast action movies, has a better dark colors. However, they are much heavier than LCD. Burns images of photographs. Plasmas are 40 "and UP.
LCD: For the best picture quality, they last much longer than plasmas. No image burn ins. And above all, are much lighter. LCD size from 1 "and UP. LCD computer monitors are.
I prefer the LCD for the best price and quality.
Also ........ Plasmas are less energy efficient. which tend to consume 25-30% more energy than the same size LCD.
They are also heavier and heavier mounted on a wall if you want.
Although the problem of selling large plasma "blackest black", ie the difference ...... I noticed a 46 "plasma and LCD side by side and honestly could not tell the difference.
I have gone further, but I bought a 46 "Sony Bravia (LCD.) to, in my humble opinion, can grow TVs-but-not better. Watching a Blu-ray is 1080p but the" impressive. "
Good luck to you, no matter what technology or brand you buy - it's your look and your budget ULTimtley decide.
Post a Comment